February 2, 2025
Decades of Lies from the Left
By E. Jeffrey Ludwig
A short video from 2021 of Avi Horowitz interviewing students at Yale University was recently re-posted by Prager Univ. The students in the video found the idea of getting rid of our U.S. Constitution to be plausible and interesting, and moreover, many of them embraced that as a legitimate and desirable goal. One of the interviewees stated emphatically that our Constitution is a racist document. Although it is not clear that this brief video represents a majority or even a sizable minority of the students at Yale, it is amazing to this writer that we should hear even a few voices at one of our leading educational institutions so hostile to the fundamental laws that govern our democratic republic.
As a simple-minded person, I grew up with the idea that following the laws of the United States in matters large and small was a blessed opportunity. Following our laws is not something I ever did grudgingly because of a deeper feeling or thought process that by doing so, I was sabotaging my own life and the lives of others. No. I grew up wanting to be a law-abiding but reflective citizen because I believed in the fundamental values of law and government that are historically pre-eminent in our country.
At one point, during the anti–Vietnam War protests, I was studying as a graduate student at Harvard, and a cadre of students had chained the doors and barricaded themselves into one of the administrative buildings as a protest against the war. I agreed that there were legitimate areas to debate about war policy, but an unalloyed opposition to the war to the extent of actually breaking the law in order to communicate the intensity of that opposition was over the top, uncalled for.
As I stood in the middle of Harvard Yard within a large crowd of onlookers, wondering what would happen next, I was standing next to another slightly more advanced student who was studying for his Ph.D. in economics. He was considerably farther left than I, but we had both graduated from the same high school in Philadelphia and the same undergraduate university. He was totally sympathetic to the demonstrators who had locked themselves into the building, who were members of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), a far-left group popular at that time.
I asked him, “How can you be so supportive of SDS, which is so intensely critical of the USA and is communist? You have the same background as I. We both were able to take advantage of the opportunities of U.S. society, attending the same high school and college, and now we are enrolled in one of the top universities in the country. Why do you hate the USA so much? Why do you hate capitalism so much? We are examples of the opportunities and success of the USA and of capitalism in discovering and supporting talent — even advancing people from non-elite backgrounds like us.”
He looked at me and listened to my mini-rant in contemptuous silence. His eyes alone conveyed the words: “You wouldn’t understand even if I told you.” Ultimately, he would join another Harvard leftie, Samuel Bowles, at the University of Massachusetts, where he spent most of his career.
The ideological leftist infection grows at many of our institutions of so-called higher education, brought on by a blind spot created by a simple lack of gratitude for the opportunities afforded us as citizens of the USA. Upward mobility is a reality in this country. An article published in the Wall Street Journal only two years ago makes it abundantly clear: “studies show the vast majority of adults have higher income than their parents did.” Further, and with the inclusion of compelling charts, the article states, “This upward mobility across all income classifications was possible because of the growth of the American economy. Over the 35 years of the study, real median family income rose by 89%.”
However, during the 60-plus years since that building takeover and that landmark confrontation with my brilliant co-student, incredible progress has been made by the leftist intellectuals in their influence on the masses and on many of our campuses. The latest knife in the back by the left to our laws and Constitution has been the open borders policy, which has led to millions of unvetted persons entering our country during the Joe Biden presidency to do murder and mayhem.
Our leadership willingly broke the laws of our country and had our border patrols sitting on their hands for four years. Incredibly, in 2006, Joe Biden stated, “Folks...I voted for 700 miles of fence,” “[but] unless you change the dynamic in Mexico and — and you will not like this, and — punish American employers who knowingly violate the law when, in fact, they hire illegals...unless you do those two things, all the rest is window dressing.”
Biden continued: “And let me tell you something folks: people are driving across that border with tons, tons, hear me, tons of everything from byproducts for methamphetamines to cocaine to heroin [now let’s add fentanyl], and it’s all coming up through corrupt Mexico.”
He said this only 15 years prior to assuming the presidency and implementing the worst border enforcement policies since the USA was founded. Add together the cost to the American people to feed, house, clothe, provide medical assistance to, provide cell phones to, and transport these millions of illegal border-crossers, and this “open door” policy has put the health and safety of our country at risk. Was Biden’s change of mind caused by his cognitive decline, or was there some nefarious behind-the-scenes manipulation that remains a mystery?
As President Trump moves forward to correct the horrible border policies of the Biden administration as well as the lies that accompanied those policies, we should not allow ourselves to “feel sorry” for those who came here under the instigation of leftist non-governmental organizations whose main goal is to destabilize the USA in order to bring about more authoritarian left-wing governance. Democrat policies, whether about immigration, marriage, gender identity, urban law and order, birth, and economics, are all oriented toward destabilization of the social order. The destabilization requires more authoritarian interventions and thus enlarged government power over the day-to-day interactions and decisions of its citizens. That is the leftist agenda in a nutshell. The leftist motto might well be: do what Big Brother says, and all will end well. But it’s a lie, folks — a big, fat lie!
Today marks the three hundred and thirtieth birthday of the Frenchman François-Marie Arouet, better known by his nom de plume, Voltaire (1694-1778).
Born into a bourgeois family during the reign of Louis XIV, the “Sun King” (r. 1643-1715), Voltaire suffered tragedy at a young age when his mother died. Never close with his father or brother, Voltaire exhibited a rebellious attitude toward authority from his youth. His brilliant mind was fostered in the care of the Society of Jesus, who introduced him to the joys of literature and theater. Despite his later criticisms against the Church, Voltaire, throughout his life, fondly recalled his dedicated Jesuit teachers.
Although he spent time as a civil servant in the French embassy to the Hague, Voltaire’s main love was writing—an endeavor where he excelled in various genres, including poetry, which led to his appointment as the royal court poet for King Louis XV. Widely recognized as one of the greatest French writers, and even hyperbolically referred to by ...
Padre - Tom Miller invites you to a Coffee Talk, Speakeasies, Schmoozes, Tea Times, Afterhours and other gatherings.
https://teams.live.com/meet/93792382189049?p=DiBHsYfuECPgDrG7vO
2026 Coffee Talk with the ADD Irregulars
Thursday, January 1, 2026
6:00 AM - 8:00 AM (CST)
Occurs every day starting 1/1 until 12/31/2027
Coffee Talk - Daily beginning at 6:00 AM Central Time Zone - USA
White Pilled Wednesday - A break from the heaviness of news and current events to focus upon things more personal & positive for the first hour of Coffee Talk.
Afternoon Chats - Most Tuesday, Friday & Sundays 2:00 PM Central
Other chats as posted in the community.
Good morning, digital neighbors! I will be away this week at Convocation and mostly offline. I will check in to keep the email from piling up, but I will not be doing my morning missives, checking in for Teams Coffee Talk, or any other posting throughout the week. Please know that you will be on my mind and in my prayers.
Our Vicar for Priests sent out this message to the faithful to explain the nature of the Convocation:
Once every four years for the past four decades, the priests of the Archdiocese of St. Louis have been called together by our Archbishop for a week-long Convocation. It is a time of prayer, enrichment for ministry, and fellowship in priestly fraternity.
As the experience of priestly life and ministry in our Archdiocese continues to evolve — particularly as priests are called upon to pastor multiple parishes simultaneously, and as communities as large as 1,800 to 2,000 households are increasingly served by only one priest — opportunities for enrichment for our priests, such as ...

One day there came into the Garden a man in torn clothes badly bruised and cut, who said to the Lover, “In the name of the Beloved I demand your help.”
So the Lover and the Disciple let him in and dressed his wounds and prepared the best of the vegetables from the Garden for him to eat. When his wounds had been dressed and he had eaten and rested the Lover asked him how he had fallen into this plight, to which the man replied, “I was Minister of the Beloved in a city near this place, where I preached His gospel and expounded His doctrine to the people. I pointed out to them how their sins had made them wholly hateful to the Beloved and how therefore they were utterly beyond the range of His love and He would condemn them to eternal torments, whereon some fell into despair and wept bitterly but many were angry. One day the magistrates called me before them and begged me to leave the city and preach elsewhere for they said I had made many people so angry and desperate that they feared there might be a riot and they might not be able to protect me but that I might suffer some injury. I, however, very zealous for the Beloved and believing that the magistrates only feared that their own sins might be proclaimed, preached the more vehemently, denounced the magistrates and made it abundantly clear that the whole wicked city was foredoomed to eternal punishment by the just provision of the Beloved. Whereon a mob, stirred up no doubt by the corrupt and venal magistrates, fell upon me with sticks and stones, nearly killing me and driving me out of the city in the state in which I came to you.”
“My friend,” said the Lover, “this was not a good deed of yours, for besides denying the unfathomable compassion of the Beloved, you have by your obstinacy caused these people to commit a grievous sin, and this cannot be pleasing to the Beloved, that through you who profess to be His minister the people should become worse. Surely you remember that He Himself said, ‘If they persecute you in one city flee to another.’”
Therefore the man was very angry, and cursing the Lover, said, “I see that I have had a very false report of you and I do not believe that you are a servant of the Beloved at all. When I came to you so injured for the Beloved’s sake you set before me only herbs and fruits although the garden is full of birds which you could have killed to make me a worthy meal. I shall proclaim everywhere that you are no true servant of the Beloved but a mere falterer who dares not suffer in the cause of the Beloved. Be sure that you are foreordained to eternal torments who suffer nothing here.”
For the man was so blinded by his own pride that he could not perceive the scars on the hands and feet and the brows of the Lover nor how the cloth beneath the armpits of his tunic was dyed with a red dye. So he went out of the Garden cursing and shouting.
But the Lover looked sad and said, “A man like this does much harm to the cause of the Beloved, for by thus speaking falsely about the Beloved he may bring men to fear Him but none to love Him, and by love alone can any man approach the Beloved.”